Supportable predictions of the probability that a repository'sĮngineered! or geologic barriers will be breaches! as a result of Whether it is reasonable to make scientifically The exposure of individual members of the public to radiation Risk of breaching the repository's engineered barriers or increasing On active institutional controls, that will prevent an unreasonable Post-closure oversight of the repository can be cieveloped, based Whether it is reasonable to assume that a system for The scientific basis for predicting human intrusion and the potential for Some future time people might intrude into the repository, therebyĭefeating its geologic and engineered barriers. The second en c! third questions concern the potential that at Incliviciual dose as a criterion for protecting the public, was addressed inĬhapter 2. In Section 801(a)(2) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, CongressĪsked three specific questions. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages. Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |